Cosa volete, io sono stupido. Mi ostino a cercare di avere un dialogo con persone che si rifiutano di leggere cosa scrivi, e quando lo leggono lo rifiutano in toto senza neanche considerare l'opzione.
Voglio dare un esempio con il commento di 'Viaggiatore' (non metto il nick usato su Facebook per motivi di privacy):
Mettiamola così Claudio, se Einstein fosse stato tarato come i geni del CICAP neanche il CERN esisterebbe e mi parli di gente più intelligente di te... beh potrebbero anche essere al tuo livello il risultato rimane identico.
Why do you think we study texts in physics and quantum mechanics? And why medical science is in crisis and many are determined by subtracting the vaccines and medical treatment? Perhaps because the scientific method is making water from all sides? Maybe because with the advent of the Internet and information people have stopped hanging from the lips of other people who calls himself a scientist and his science is illogical and inaccurate?
What can you respond to someone who makes these statements?
PS: a new gem of the same.
Daccordissimo with Elijah and add ... the scientific method is not in crisis? Are you sure? Just because the newspapers did not is talking about does not mean that it is not. You must open a parenthesis here because I think we should plug some eyes.
begin by saying that the appearance of physicians who deny their job to validate new theories are becoming more frequent. Based on the Method Hamer the various treatments with bicarbonate Simoncini homeopathy, the pranotherapy and all the alternative medicines that have less hitting and damaging a chance. Even the very Electrobiology puts in doubt the validity of medical and scientific methods.
But I understand that these great scientists could be far-fetched things, so we want to talk about drugs? Of the billions of revenue to the pharmaceutical and numbers of people become millionaires che è divenuta tossicodipendente legale, ovvero schiavi di farmaci che li rendono zombi e mentalmente instabili quando avevano solo chiesto aiuto per risolvere alcuni disturbi emotivi.
Io sto scrivendo un libro che tratta proprio questi argomenti perchè il mio lavoro cerca di combattere questo validissimo metodo scientifico che ha massacrato la capacità e la dignità umana.
Forse lo scopo dei vaccini non è lo stesso della produzione dei psicofarmaci? Forse le case farmaceutiche che producevano i vaccini non si sono straarricchite ai danni di tutte quelle persone che sono state vittime degli effetti collaterali dei vaccini stessi? (E mi riferiscono a notizie ottenute da familiari che attualmente vivono e ricoprono occupazioni di rilievo in campo doctor in the United States and information from various blog shortly before they were closed and censored) Anthony
Then, speak to me research underpaid, I agree with you. Especially in Italy live the discomfort of research now nothing but my research has to be the pretext for arriicchire so many people against other "Doctor I" should rebel, and as the Hippocratic Oath (I will not harm and hurt) me demands it should call into question all the doubts that arise in this connection to me. but that does not do it because 99% of doctors would have too much trouble.
Meanwhile, many doctors and nurses have rejected vaccination and many governments have been imposed would have otherwise charged billion in damages.
So ... the scientific method is not really in crisis?
. Wikio
0 comments:
Post a Comment